Subscribe to Home Textiles Today
Industry Resources

Milling Around

November 21, 2011

Sometimes in the sweep of events it's difficult to remember exactly when things hit an inflection point.

That is not the case for me. I joined HTT in the spring of 2000, when the industry titans were still large, American mills.

Within a single year, several of them were in bankruptcy. By 2005, most of them were gone.

Frankly, I am surprised not by how much production has disappeared from the United States but that any remains.
It's heartening to see manufacturers find niches that can be addressed more profitably here than offshore. It's nice to hear consumers are pressing retailers here and there - mostly online, it seems - to put up some U.S.-made product.

I don't know a single manufacturing exec who didn't lament off-shoring. Many of these mills were named after the towns in which they were founded (or vice versa). Most of them had a strong sense of pride in employing generations of families.

Because of that, some held on longer than it was fiscally prudent to do so.

The "Made in the USA" conundrum presents us with the double-edged sword that has characterized so much of the off-shoring phenomenon. On the one hand, it absolutely decimated an industry that once employed hundreds of thousands. (The National Textile Organization's roster of company-by-company plant closings and layoffs by manufacturers of fabrics, apparel and home textiles from the 1990s through the aught years is more depressing than words can convey.)

On the other hand, as we are often reminded, it made better merchandise more affordable to many more consumers.
I think of a story that ran in the New York Times several years ago when Etch-a-Sketch closed its last plant in the U.S. At peak production in the 1960s, the pad retailed for about $11, according to the story. Moving production off-shore brought the retail down to something like $7. Not that big a change, you'd think, but the story pointed out that $11 in 1968 was closer to $35 in contemporary terms - and who on earth would pay $35 for an Etch-a-Sketch today?

All in all, the industry has rolled with the punches - and heaven knows, the blows have come fast and hard. In that sense, it's great to see how smart and responsive and resilient the industry turned out to be.

Posted by Jennifer Marks on November 21, 2011 | Comments (3)

February 29, 2012
In response to: Milling Around
Barbara commented:

I think one of the coloest things is that if the flour and cornmeal smell good already... well just imagine what a BAKED good smells like! That's going to be multiplied delicious by a thousand :)


February 28, 2012
In response to: Milling Around
Marcelo commented:

I think this is among the such a lot sncgifinait information for me. And i'm glad reading your article. However should observation on some common things, The website style is great, the articles is actually excellent . Just right task, cheers.


November 22, 2011
In response to: Milling Around
Pradeep Mukherjee commented:

Historically, when manufacture was in the USA, protective measures like higher percentage import duty on fancy hems , embroideries etc. were justified to give protection. The unequal tariffs remain today, even though manufacturing has gone.This only prevents the US customer from getting beautifully made home textile products,which they can see in EU and in Canada.

POST A COMMENT
Display Name
captcha

Before submitting this form, please type the characters displayed above. Note the letters are case sensitive:

Advertisement
Research
Advertisement
Live from Heimtextil
NEWSLETTERS
eletter_callout_box_HTT


About Us   |   Advertising Info   |   Site Map   |   Contact Us   |   Subscription   |   Affiliate Links   |   RSS
© 2012 Sandow Media LLC.All rights reserved.
Use of this website is subject to its Terms of Use | Privacy Policy